Learning subgrid interfacial area in two-phase flows with regime-dependent inductive biases
Anirban Bhattacharjee, Luis H. Hatashita, Suhas S. Jain

TL;DR
This paper develops and compares physics-informed and purely data-driven machine learning models to predict subgrid interfacial area density in turbulent multiphase flows, highlighting the importance of regime-dependent inductive biases.
Contribution
It introduces a physics-constrained model with a fractal geometric prior and demonstrates its regime-dependent effectiveness in improving predictions over purely data-driven models.
Findings
Physics-based model improves accuracy and reduces artifacts.
Regime-dependent effectiveness of inductive biases in modeling.
Embedded biases enhance generalization in certain flow regimes.
Abstract
The reliability of machine learning in multiscale physical systems depends on how physical structure is embedded into the learning process. We investigate this in the context of turbulent multiphase flows, focusing on the prediction of subgrid interfacial area density, a key quantity governing interphase transport that remains unresolved in large-eddy simulations. In this work, we develop and evaluate two machine learning subgrid closure models to predict the three-dimensional subgrid interfacial area density: a purely data-driven 3D encoder-decoder network, and a physics-constrained variant regularized by a fractal geometric prior. Across a range of Weber numbers, the physics-based model improves predictive accuracy, reduces error variance, and suppresses nonphysical artifacts relative to purely data-driven approaches. We also show that these gains are regime-dependent: the embedded…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
