What Did They Mean? How LLMs Resolve Ambiguous Social Situations across Perspectives and Roles
Qiming Yuan, Linyi Han, Nam Ling, Cihan Ruan

TL;DR
This paper investigates how large language models interpret ambiguous social situations, revealing their tendency to resolve uncertainty into coherent narratives, which poses challenges for designing socially aware AI systems.
Contribution
It provides a systematic analysis of LLM responses to ambiguous social scenarios across multiple domains, highlighting their propensity for interpretive closure and the influence of perspective.
Findings
Only 12.5% of responses genuinely preserved uncertainty.
87.5% of responses produced interpretive closure through various pathways.
Narrator perspective influences the interpretation pathway.
Abstract
People increasingly turn to large language models (LLMs) to interpret ambiguous social situations: a delayed text reply, an unusually cold supervisor, a teacher's mixed signals, or a boundary-crossing friend. Yet in many such cases, no stable interpretation can be verified from the available evidence alone. We study how LLMs respond to these situations across four domains: early-stage romantic relationships, teacher--student dynamics, workplace hierarchies, and ambiguous friendships. Across 72 responses from GPT, Claude, and Gemini, only 9 (12.5\%) genuinely preserved uncertainty. The remaining 87.5% produced interpretive closure through recurring pathways including narrative alignment, narrative reversal, normative advice under uncertainty, and hedged language that still supported a single conclusion. We further find that narrator perspective shapes the path to closure: first-person…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
