Countable Fan Tightness and Selection Games in Group-Valued Function Spaces
Souvik Mandal, Ankur Sarkar

TL;DR
This paper extends game-theoretic characterizations of covering properties from real-valued to group-valued function spaces, establishing equivalences between selection games on the space and tightness games on function spaces.
Contribution
It generalizes existing results from real-valued functions to arbitrary metrizable arc-connected groups, connecting selection principles with tightness properties in group-valued function spaces.
Findings
Player II has a winning strategy in the $oldsymbol{ ext{Omega-Menger}}$ game iff in the countable fan tightness game on $C_p(X,G)$
Equivalence between $oldsymbol{ ext{Omega-Rothberger}}$ game on $X$ and countable strong fan tightness game on $C_p(X,G)$
Game-theoretic tightness properties are independent of $G$, preserved under $G$-equivalence, and valid for Markov strategies.
Abstract
Game-theoretic characterizations of selection principles provide a powerful framework for analyzing covering properties through strategic interactions. For a Tychonoff space and a non-trivial metrizable arc-connected topological group , we prove that Player~II has a winning strategy in the -Menger game on if and only if Player~II has a winning strategy in the countable fan tightness game on at the identity function. The analogous equivalence is established between the -Rothberger game on and the countable strong fan tightness game on at the identity function. These results extend the game-theoretic characterizations of Clontz from to arbitrary metrizable arc-connected groups, and lift the selection-principle equivalences of Ko\v{c}inac to the game-theoretic setting. As consequences, we establish that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
