Two Exciting High-redshift Galaxy Candidates Turn Out to Be Two Exciting Ultra-cool Brown Dwarfs
Maru\v{s}a Brada\v{c} (1, 2), Chris Willott (3), Yoshihisa Asada (4), Lo\"ic Albert (5), Gregor Rihtar\v{s}i\v{c} (1), Anishya Harshan (1), Jon Jude\v{z} (1), Nicholas S. Martis (1), Andrea Ferrara (6), Abdurro'uf (7), Joseph F. V. Allingham (8), Volker Bromm (9, 10, and 11)

TL;DR
Initial high-redshift galaxy candidates observed by JWST were later identified as ultra-cool brown dwarfs, highlighting the importance of follow-up spectroscopy to distinguish between distant galaxies and local sub-stellar objects.
Contribution
This study demonstrates that some JWST high-redshift galaxy candidates are actually ultra-cool brown dwarfs, revealing the need for careful analysis to avoid misclassification in deep surveys.
Findings
Two candidates initially thought to be high-redshift galaxies are ultra-cool brown dwarfs.
Spectroscopic and proper motion data confirm their sub-stellar nature.
The sky density of Y dwarfs is estimated at 0.14 per arcmin$^2$, affecting survey strategies.
Abstract
From the onset of observations of JWST we have discovered unexpectedly luminous galaxies at redshifts and as high as . With their discovery, the question immediately followed as to where their progenitors are, since such progenitors should be within reach of existing surveys. However, the discovery of several bright candidates at may indicate further discrepancies between pre-JWST model predictions and current observations. Progenitors of the bright galaxies should be visible at redshifts as high as --, showing in the data as F356W and F277W dropouts. We identify two such candidates in the Bullet Cluster JWST data; however, subsequent NIRSpec follow-up data show spectra that can be well fit with ultra-cool Y dwarf templates with temperatures and and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
