A theory of ROC analysis of rule-out and rule-in diagnostics with applications to mammography data
Michelle Mastrianni, Kwok Lung Fan, Yee Lam Elim Thompson, Jessie J.J. Gommers, Ioannis Sechopoulos, Fredrik Strand, Weijie Chen, Gary Levine, Mukul Sherekar, Frank W. Samuelson

TL;DR
This paper develops a copula-based theoretical framework to analyze ROC curves for correlated diagnostic tests, applied to mammography data with AI assistance, revealing how correlations affect diagnostic performance.
Contribution
It introduces a novel copula-based theory for ROC analysis of correlated tests and applies it to mammography data with AI, providing insights into test correlation effects.
Findings
Increasing radiologist-AI correlation for diseased cases improves AUC in rule-out scenarios.
Decreasing correlation for non-diseased cases enhances rule-out ROC performance.
Empirical data aligns with the theoretical predictions about correlation effects.
Abstract
Multiple diagnostic tests are frequently used to determine the presence of a disease condition in patients. In this paper, we use bivariate copulas to examine the properties of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves formed when two correlated diagnostic tests are used together to rule-out ("believe the negative") and rule-in ("believe the positive") patients for disease. We use this theory to analyze three mammography data sets where AI devices are applied to reduce radiologists' workload or improve diagnostic performance. Our analysis shows with generality that increasing the radiologist-AI correlation for diseased cases enhances the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of a radiologist-AI rule-out curve, whereas decreasing correlation for non-diseased cases has a similar effect. The opposite trends hold for rule-in scenarios. Applications to clinical mammography data show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
