Direct Imaging Constraints on Binary Planets and Exomoons around Epsilon Indi A b
Matson Garza (1), Mary Anne Limbach (2), Rachel Bowens-Rubin (2, 3), Matthew De Furio (4), Elisabeth C. Matthews (5), Kyle Franson (6), Sarah C. Millholland (1), Logan A. Pearce (2), Andrew Vanderburg (7) ((1) Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

TL;DR
This study uses JWST/MIRI imaging to search for potential exomoons or binary planets around Epsilon Indi A b, finding possible evidence for a binary planet but attributing it likely to systematics.
Contribution
First application of JWST/MIRI data to directly search for exomoons or binary planets within the Hill sphere of a directly imaged exoplanet.
Findings
Bayesian analysis favors a double-PSF model, suggesting a possible binary planet.
Sensitivity to companions as faint as 0.03 times the planet's flux at large separations.
Demonstrates JWST/MIRI's capability to detect exomoons or binary planets within Hill spheres.
Abstract
Epsilon Indi A b is a directly imaged exoplanet orbiting a nearby (3.6 pc) K-dwarf at AU. We analyze archival JWST/MIRI 15 m coronagraphic imaging of this planet to search for directly imaged satellites orbiting Eps Ind A b. Within the planet's Hill sphere (radius AU or ), we compare single- and double-PSF models using Bayesian evidence. We find that a double-PSF (binary planet) fit is preferred. This apparent preference can most plausibly be explained by systematics, although follow-up observations would be required to fully rule out a binary planet interpretation. We construct a contrast curve of the exoplanet after removing this feature, demonstrating sensitivity to companions as faint as the F1550C flux of Eps Ind A b (equivalent to K, ) at large separations (>2 AU). We also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
