Forecasting graviton-mass constraints from the full covariance of PTA-astrometry ORF estimators
Jing-Hong Han, Zhi-Chao Zhao

TL;DR
This paper develops a full-covariance formalism for PTA-astrometry estimators to forecast constraints on graviton mass from a stochastic gravitational-wave background, showing significant improvements with future observatories.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive covariance framework for PTA-astrometry overlap reduction function estimators and applies it to forecast graviton-mass bounds.
Findings
Current bounds: $m_g<4.41\times10^{-24}$ eV/c^2 with NANOGrav and Gaia.
Future bounds: $m_g<0.48\times10^{-24}$ eV/c^2 with SKA and Theia/Gaia-NIR.
Astrometric channels significantly enhance graviton-mass constraints in future configurations.
Abstract
We develop a full-covariance formalism for pulsar timing array(PTA) -- astrometry verlap reduction function (ORF) estimators and use it to forecast graviton-mass constraints from a nanohertz stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB). Analytic covariance expressions are derived for auto- and cross-channel ORF estimators, including signal-signal, noise-noise, and signal-noise contributions, and are validated against numerical simulations. For an observational configuration with sensitivities comparable to NANOGrav and Gaia, we obtain an expected joint 90\% upper limit of , which remains PTA-dominated and lies at the same order of magnitude as the existing NANOGrav 15-year PTA-only bound. For a future-like configuration with sensitivities comparable to the SKA and Theia/Gaia-NIR, the astrometric channels contribute significantly to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
