An Analysis of Active Learning Algorithms using Real-World Crowd-sourced Text Annotations
Varun Totakura, Ankita Singh, Yushun Dong, Shayok Chakraborty

TL;DR
This paper empirically evaluates eight active learning algorithms using real-world crowd-sourced text annotations, highlighting their performance under noisy and incomplete labeling conditions.
Contribution
It provides the first extensive empirical analysis of active learning techniques with real crowd-sourced annotations, revealing their robustness and limitations in practical scenarios.
Findings
Active learning performance varies significantly with real-world noisy annotations.
Crowd-sourced annotations reveal issues like incorrect labels and missing labels.
Insights support deploying active learning in real-world, imperfect annotation environments.
Abstract
Active learning algorithms automatically identify the most informative samples from large amounts of unlabeled data and tremendously reduce human annotation effort in inducing a machine learning model. In a conventional active learning setup, the labeling oracles are assumed to be infallible, that is, they always provide correct answers (in terms of class labels) to the queried unlabeled instances, which cannot be guaranteed in real-world applications. To this end, a body of research has focused on the development of active learning algorithms in the presence of imperfect / noisy oracles. Existing research on active learning with noisy oracles typically simulate the oracles using machine learning models; however, real-world situations are much more challenging, and using ML models to simulate the annotation patterns may not appropriately capture the nuances of real-world annotation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
