Characterization of the Volatile Properties of 133P/Elst-Pizarro and Other Main-Belt Comets with JWST and Ground-Based Observations
Henry H. Hsieh, John W. Noonan, Michael S. P. Kelley, Dennis Bodewits, Jana Pittichova, Audrey Thirouin, Marco Micheli, Scott S. Sheppard, Colin O. Chandler, Theodore Kareta, Colin Snodgrass, Richard E. Cannon, Brian P. Murphy

TL;DR
This study uses JWST and ground-based observations to analyze the volatile composition and water outgassing rates of main-belt comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, providing new insights into its activity and volatile depletion.
Contribution
It presents the first measurements of water vapor outgassing rates of 133P at two different points in its orbit and assesses the volatile composition of multiple MBCs with JWST.
Findings
Water vapor outgassing rates measured at two orbit points show a potential decline of ~25%.
No detection of CO, CO2, or CH3OH, indicating hypervolatile depletion similar to other MBCs.
Water production rates show no clear correlation with nucleus size, semimajor axis, or heliocentric distance.
Abstract
We report results from an analysis of the volatile composition and evolution of main-belt comet (MBC) 133P/Elst-Pizarro using JWST NIRSpec and NIRCam observations and ground-based observations during its 2024 active apparition, and also assess the body of JWST MBC observations acquired to date. Using NIRSpec, we measure water vapor outgassing rates at two points in 133P's orbit, finding Q(H2O)=(1.9+/-0.6)x10^25 molecules/s on UT 2024 June 12 (at a true anomaly of nu=8 deg and heliocentric distance of rh=2.674 au), and Q(H2O)=(1.4+/-0.4)x10^25 molecules/s on UT 2024 October 14 (at nu=37.4 deg and rh=2.747 au). These measurements nominally represent a decline of ~25% in Q(H2O) between the visits, although they are also consistent with no change within uncertainties. We do not detect CO, CO2, or CH3OH, placing 133P's hypervolatile depletion (Q(CO2)/Q(H_2O)<0.009) at a similar level found…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
