TL;DR
This paper introduces new research expertise indices and their variants, along with an R package 'xxdi' that implements these metrics to better assess institutional thematic research strength.
Contribution
It presents novel expertise indices, their variants, and a comprehensive R package for calculating these metrics, enhancing research evaluation tools.
Findings
New expertise indices and variants proposed
The 'xxdi' R package implements these indices
Package available on CRAN and GitHub
Abstract
In the academic landscape, scientific research has been primarily conducted through research institutions, which requires a massive influx of funds from various sources. Presently, these funding bodies have been moving from trust-based funding to performance-based evaluation systems for granting funds to the research bodies. This has led to the rise in popularity of various indices or statistics that measure institutional research strength or expertise. Institutional research expertise usually focuses on publication volume and its impact measured using the widely used h- and g-indices. However, these indices fail to capture the thematic expertise of research for institutions. To address this gap, two new expertise indicators, namely the x-index, the x_d-index, and bias-adjusted variants, the field-normalised x_d-index, and the fractional x_d-index, were introduced recently.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
