Useful nonrobust features are ubiquitous in biomedical images
Coenraad Mouton, Randle Rabe, Niklas C. Koser, Nicolai Krekiehn, Christopher Hansen, Jan-Bernd H\"ovener, Claus-C. Gl\"uer

TL;DR
This paper investigates the role of nonrobust features in medical imaging deep learning models, showing they improve in-distribution accuracy but harm out-of-distribution robustness, highlighting a trade-off.
Contribution
It demonstrates the prevalence of nonrobust features in biomedical images and analyzes their impact on model accuracy and robustness under distribution shifts.
Findings
Models trained on nonrobust features perform well in-distribution.
Adversarial training enhances robustness but reduces accuracy.
Nonrobust features cause a robustness-accuracy trade-off.
Abstract
We study whether deep networks for medical imaging learn useful nonrobust features - predictive input patterns that are not human interpretable and highly susceptible to small adversarial perturbations - and how these features impact test performance. We show that models trained only on nonrobust features achieve well above chance accuracy across five MedMNIST classification tasks, confirming their predictive value in-distribution. Conversely, adversarially trained models that primarily rely on robust features sacrifice in-distribution accuracy but yield markedly better performance under controlled distribution shifts (MedMNIST-C). Overall, nonrobust features boost standard accuracy yet degrade out-of-distribution performance, revealing a practical robustness-accuracy trade-off in medical imaging classification tasks that should be tailored to the requirements of the deployment setting.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
