Quark Number Susceptibilities and Conserved Charge Fluctuations in $(2+1)$-flavor QCD with M\"obius domain-wall fermions (MDWF)
Jishnu Goswami, Yasumichi Aoki, Hidenori Fukaya, Shoji Hashimoto, Issaku Kanamori, Takashi Kaneko, Yoshifumi Nakamura, David Ward, Yu Zhang (JLQCD Collaboration)

TL;DR
This study computes conserved-charge fluctuations in 2+1 flavor QCD using M"obius domain-wall fermions, analyzing lattice-spacing and quark-mass effects, and compares results with hadron resonance gas models across the crossover region.
Contribution
First calculations of second- and selected fourth-order conserved-charge fluctuations in 2+1 flavor QCD with M"obius domain-wall fermions at physical and heavier pion masses.
Findings
Fluctuations below pseudocritical temperature agree with hadron resonance gas models.
Fluctuations rise rapidly across the crossover and approach Stefan--Boltzmann limits.
First comparison of certain fourth-order cumulants with hadron resonance gas calculations.
Abstract
We calculate second- and selected fourth-order conserved-charge fluctuations in -flavor QCD using M\"obius domain-wall fermions (MDWF) along a line of constant physics. Gauge ensembles were generated for two light-to-strange quark-mass ratios, and , corresponding to heavier-than-physical and physical pion masses, respectively. For , calculations were carried out on lattices with temporal extents and , enabling an assessment of lattice-spacing effects at heavier pion mass. For , calculations were performed at , allowing us to study the light-quark-mass dependence down to the physical point. Below the pseudocritical temperature, second-order electric-charge, strangeness, and off-diagonal conserved-charge fluctuations are consistent with QMHRG2020 hadron resonance gas calculations. Across the crossover…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
