Deep Learning for Model Calibration in Simulation of Itaconic Acid Production
Daria Fokina, Marco Baldan, Constantin Romankiewicz, Wolfgang Laudensack, Roland Ulber, Michael Bortz

TL;DR
This paper compares deep learning methods for estimating parameters in itaconic acid production models, finding that generative conditional flow matching (CFM) outperforms direct deep learning and nonlinear regression.
Contribution
It introduces and benchmarks CFM as a robust, data-efficient deep learning approach for dynamic bioprocess parameter estimation across scales.
Findings
CFM yields more accurate parameter estimates than DDL.
CFM closely matches nonlinear regression in concentration profile predictions.
CFM generalizes better and is more robust in scale-up experiments.
Abstract
In this study, deep learning is used to estimate kinetic parameters for modeling itaconic acid production based on real batch experiments conducted at different agitation speeds and reactor scales. Two deep learning strategies, namely direct deep learning (DDL) and generative conditional flow matching (CFM) are compared and benchmarked against nonlinear regression as a reference method. Compared with DDL, CFM consistently yields more accurate results. The concentration profiles predicted by CFM closely match those obtained from nonlinear regression, whereas DDL results in larger deviations. Similar behavior is observed in the scale-up experiments, where the CFM model again generalizes better and is more robust than the direct approach. These findings demonstrate that CFM can reliably predict system behavior across different operating conditions and scales, offering a flexible and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
