Robust Bayesian Sequential Borrowing for Multi-Population Clinical Programmes
Erik Hermansson, Lynn Dunsire, David Svensson, Thomas Jaki

TL;DR
The paper presents RBSB, a Bayesian framework for evidence borrowing in multi-population clinical trials that adaptively weights historical data based on population similarity, improving validity and efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces a novel robust mixture prior approach with closed-form weights for dynamic, transparent borrowing across ordered populations in clinical studies.
Findings
RBSB controls false positives better than full pooling.
It maintains efficiency gains over separate analyses.
The case study demonstrates practical application across different age groups.
Abstract
We introduce Robust Bayesian Sequential Borrowing (RBSB), a framework for extrapolating evidence across adjacent subgroups in multi-population clinical programmes where studies are conducted in sequence and populations are ordered by clinical proximity. Conventional approaches weight all historical sources uniformly or exclude distant populations entirely, failing to reflect the natural gradient of similarity in such programmes. RBSB encodes the programme order through path-dependent borrowing via robust mixture priors that combine an informative component with a unit-information component to guard against prior-data conflict. Posterior weights, derived in closed form from marginal likelihood ratios, provide transparent dynamic attenuation when heterogeneity arises between sequential populations. The framework supports prospective evaluation of Bayesian Type I error, power, and extends…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
