Adaptive vs. Static Robot-to-Human Handover: A Study on Orientation and Approach Direction
Federico Biagi, Dario Onfiani, Simone Silenzi, Cristina Iani, Luigi Biagiotti

TL;DR
This paper introduces an adaptive robot-to-human handover system that dynamically adjusts delivery based on user hand pose, improving safety, trust, and reducing cognitive load compared to static methods.
Contribution
The work presents a novel real-time adaptive framework integrating AI-based hand pose estimation with kinematic trajectories for improved handover interactions.
Findings
Adaptive approach reduces cognitive workload and physiological stress.
Dynamic alignment increases perceived trust in the robot.
System ensures safe and ergonomic handovers.
Abstract
Robot-to-human handovers often rely on static, open-loop strategies (or, at best, approaches that adapt only the position), which generally do not consider how the object will be grasped by the human, thus requiring the user to adapt. This work presents a novel adaptive framework that dynamically adjusts the object's delivery pose in real time based on the user's hand pose and the intended downstream task. By integrating AI-based hand pose estimation with smooth, kinematically constrained trajectories, the system ensures a safe approach and an optimal handover orientation. A comprehensive user study compares the proposed adaptive approach against a static baseline across multiple tasks, evaluating both subjective metrics (NASA-TLX, Human-Robot Trust Scale) and objective physiological data (blink rate measured via wearable eye-trackers). The results demonstrate that dynamic alignment…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
