Same Project, Different Start: How Contribution Events Shape Activity and Retention in Open Source
Mohamed Ouf, Mariam Guizani

TL;DR
This study compares event-based and organic open source contributors, revealing that event participation increases long-term engagement and core contributor likelihood, with engagement patterns influenced by entry mechanisms.
Contribution
First matched-cohort analysis showing how contribution events impact activity, retention, and engagement rhythms in open source projects.
Findings
Event contributors are more likely to become core contributors.
Mentorship leads to steady weekly activity in first 12 weeks.
Mentor-dependency affects long-term retention after program end.
Abstract
Open source projects depend on newcomers who stay, yet most leave after a single contribution. Contribution events such as Google Summer of Code, LFX Mentorship, Hacktoberfest, and 24 Pull Requests attract thousands of newcomers each year, but whether they produce lasting contributors remains unclear. We conduct the first matched-cohort study comparing 2,001 event-based and 2,001 organic contributors across 330 projects. Our results reveal three key findings. First, event contributors have significantly higher odds of becoming core contributors (12.1% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001, OR = 1.31) and stay significantly longer (median 8.2 vs. 4.8 months). Second, each entry mechanism is associated with a fundamentally different engagement rhythm: 68.9% of mentorship contributors sustain Steady weekly activity across their first 12 weeks, whereas 61.0% of non-mentorship contributors exhibit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
