TL;DR
This paper introduces RE-CONFIRM, a framework for evaluating the robustness of biomarkers identified by deep learning models, including foundation models, in predicting neurological disorders from dynamic functional connectivity.
Contribution
It proposes a new evaluation framework and a fine-tuning technique, Hub-LoRA, to improve biomarker robustness and neurobiological fidelity in brain disorder prediction models.
Findings
RE-CONFIRM reveals limitations of performance metrics in biomarker robustness.
Finetuning FMs without proper evaluation fails to capture known brain hubs.
Hub-LoRA improves model performance and biomarker neurobiological validity.
Abstract
Several brain foundation models (FM) have recently been proposed to predict brain disorders by modelling dynamic functional connectivity (FC). While they demonstrate remarkable model performance and zero- or few-shot generalization, the salient features identified as potential biomarkers are yet to be thoroughly evaluated. We propose RE-CONFIRM, a framework for evaluating the robustness of potential biomarker candidates elucidated by deep learning (DL) models including FMs. From experiments on five large datasets of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and Alzheimer's Disease (AD), we found that although commonly used performance metrics provide an intuitive assessment of model predictions, they are insufficient for evaluating the robustness of biomarkers identified by these models. RE-CONFIRM metrics revealed that simply finetuning FMs leads…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
