Addressing Image Authenticity When Cameras Use Generative AI
Umar Masud, Abhijith Punnappurath, Luxi Zhao, David B. Lindell, Michael S. Brown

TL;DR
This paper proposes a method to recover unhallucinated, authentic camera images by optimizing an image-specific neural decoder, enabling post-capture correction without access to the camera hardware.
Contribution
It introduces a self-contained, compact neural approach that can be applied post-capture to remove hallucinated content from images, preserving authenticity.
Findings
The method effectively recovers unhallucinated images from AI-altered camera outputs.
The encoder and decoder require only 180 KB of storage, suitable for embedding in standard image formats.
The approach does not need access to camera hardware or ISP during post-processing.
Abstract
The ability of generative AI (GenAI) methods to photorealistically alter camera images has raised awareness about the authenticity of images shared online. Interestingly, images captured directly by our cameras are considered authentic and faithful. However, with the increasing integration of deep-learning modules into cameras' capture-time hardware -- namely, the image signal processor (ISP) -- there is now a potential for hallucinated content in images directly output by our cameras. Hallucinated capture-time image content is typically benign, such as enhanced edges or texture, but in certain operations, such as AI-based digital zoom or low-light image enhancement, hallucinations can potentially alter the semantics and interpretation of the image content. As a result, users may not realize that the content in their camera images is not authentic. This paper addresses this issue by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
