Turbulent mixing of a hydrogen jet in crossflow: direct numerical simulation and model assessment
Yiqing Wang, Chao Xu, Riccardo Scarcelli, Ben Cantrell, Jon Anders, Sameera Wijeyakulasuriya

TL;DR
This study uses DNS, LES, and RANS to evaluate hydrogen jet mixing in crossflow, revealing LES's superior accuracy and identifying limitations in RANS modeling assumptions for turbulent diffusivity.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive DNS dataset for hydrogen jet in crossflow and insights into improving RANS turbulent mixing models.
Findings
LES accurately predicts flow and mixing compared to DNS.
RANS under-predicts turbulent stresses and mixing, due to assumptions of isotropic diffusivity.
Turbulent Schmidt number and anisotropic flux components are key factors in RANS inaccuracies.
Abstract
A numerical study for a hydrogen (H2) jet in an air crossflow (JICF) was performed using direct numerical simulation (DNS), large eddy simulation (LES), and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approaches, based on a geometry representative of key aspects of port fuel injection (PFI) in a H2-fueled heavy-duty internal combustion engine. The focus was placed on the H2 mixing process and the turbulent species flux model used in the latter two approaches. Based on the DNS data, the performance of LES and RANS on predicting the turbulent flow fields and mixing process was comprehensively evaluated. Results showed that LES performs very well in predicting both the mean velocity and the Reynolds stress. In contrast, RANS significantly under-predicts all Reynolds stress components, while predicting the mean flow field relatively well. Regarding the H2 mixing prediction, LES shows an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
