A Robust Framework for Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization under Population Heterogeneity
Dingke Tang, Xuming He, Shu Yang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a robust, model-free Mendelian randomization framework that effectively addresses population heterogeneity in two-sample summary-data studies, improving causal inference accuracy.
Contribution
The authors develop a new estimator that is consistent and asymptotically normal under heterogeneity, avoiding parametric assumptions and enhancing robustness in diverse populations.
Findings
Estimator remains consistent under population heterogeneity.
Method shows efficiency gains over classic estimators.
Real data analysis confirms robustness and practical utility.
Abstract
Mendelian randomization is a powerful tool for causal inference in observational studies. The two-sample summary-data design, which estimates genetic associations with exposures and outcomes in separate cohorts, is the most widely used Mendelian randomization approach in large-scale genomic studies. However, this approach relies on a strong assumption of population homogeneity across the two samples. In practice, available samples often differ in ancestry, demographics, socioeconomic factors, covariate adjustment, and measurement protocols. Violations of the homogeneity assumption can bias causal effect estimates and undermine the credibility of Mendelian randomization findings. We introduce a robust, model-free Mendelian randomization framework that directly addresses population heterogeneity in the two-sample summary-data setting. Our method avoids parametric assumptions about…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
