LightStim: A Framework for QEC Protocol Evaluation and Prototyping with Automated DEM Construction
Xiang Fang, Ming Wang, Yue Wu, Sharanya Prabhu, Dean Tullsen, Narasinga Rao Miniskar, Frank Mueller, Travis Humble, Yufei Ding

TL;DR
LightStim automates the construction of Detector Error Models during quantum circuit compilation, enabling rigorous, end-to-end evaluation and prototyping of diverse quantum error correction protocols without protocol-specific input.
Contribution
It introduces LightStim, a framework that automates DEM creation, facilitating systematic evaluation and exploration of quantum error correction protocols with no manual annotation.
Findings
LightStim accurately reproduces detector counts and logical error rates.
It accelerates protocol exploration, demonstrated with a novel lattice surgery design.
Benchmarking confirms LightStim's effectiveness across various QEC protocols.
Abstract
Fault-tolerant quantum computing increasingly demands rigorous, circuit-level evaluation of diverse quantum error correction (QEC) protocols and efficient prototyping of new ones. Such evaluation requires both the physical circuit and its Detector Error Model (DEM) to simulate end-to-end logical error rates. However, DEM construction today is performed by manual annotation, a tedious and error-prone process that effectively limits evaluation to simple memory experiments. We present LightStim, a framework that automates DEM construction concurrently with circuit compilation by maintaining a Pauli tableau augmented with measurement records, with no protocol-specific input required. We benchmark LightStim across protocols from memory experiments to end-to-end distillation circuits; cross-validation against public implementations confirms exact detector and observable counts and consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
