TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel two-step reasoning approach using fine-tuned large language models to improve future occupation prediction accuracy based on user history.
Contribution
It develops a method to generate high-quality reasons that enhance occupation prediction, outperforming separate task fine-tuning and matching supervised methods.
Findings
Fine-tuned LLMs achieve accuracy comparable to supervised methods.
Single LLM fine-tuning outperforms separate task fine-tuning.
Prediction accuracy depends on the quality of generated reasons.
Abstract
In this work, we develop a novel reasoning approach to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) in future occupation prediction. In this approach, a reason generator first derives a ``reason'' for a user using his/her past education and career history. The reason summarizes the user's preference and is used as the input of an occupation predictor to recommend the user's next occupation. This two-step occupation prediction approach is, however, non-trivial as LLMs are not aligned with career paths or the unobserved reasons behind each occupation decision. We therefore propose to fine-tune LLMs improving their reasoning and occupation prediction performance. We first derive high-quality oracle reasons, as measured by factuality, coherence and utility criteria, using a LLM-as-a-Judge. These oracle reasons are then used to fine-tune small LLMs to perform reason generation and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
