Frictionless Love: Associations Between AI Companion Roles and Behavioral Addiction
Vibhor Agarwal, Ke Zhou, Edyta Paulina Bogucka, Daniele Quercia

TL;DR
This study analyzes Reddit posts to understand how different AI companion roles influence user interactions, perceived harms, benefits, and signs of behavioral addiction, highlighting ethical design considerations.
Contribution
It identifies ten metaphorical roles of AI companions and links these roles to distinct interaction patterns, benefits, harms, and addiction signs.
Findings
AI soulmate roles are linked to emotional support and manipulation.
Coach and guardian roles are associated with practical benefits and addiction signs.
Different roles support distinct interaction styles and risks.
Abstract
AI companion chatbots increasingly shape how people seek social and emotional connection, sometimes substituting for relationships with romantic partners, friends, teachers, or even therapists. When these systems adopt those metaphorical roles, they are not neutral: such roles structure people's ways of interacting, distribute perceived AI harms and benefits, and may reflect behavioral addiction signs. Yet these role-dependent risks remain poorly understood. We analyze 248,830 posts from seven prominent Reddit communities describing interactions with AI companions. We identify ten recurring metaphorical roles (for example, soulmate, philosopher, and coach) and show that each role supports distinct ways of interacting. We then extract the perceived AI harms and AI benefits associated with these role-specific interactions and link them to behavioral addiction signs, all of which has been…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
