On Scott's odd induced subgraph conjecture and a related problem
Bo Ning

TL;DR
This paper investigates Scott's odd induced subgraph conjecture, confirming it for claw-free graphs, providing counterexamples for certain classes, and analyzing the conjecture's validity for line graphs of regular graphs.
Contribution
It proves Scott's conjecture for claw-free graphs, constructs counterexamples for $K_{1,r}$-free graphs, and examines the conjecture's validity for line graphs of regular graphs.
Findings
Confirmed Scott's conjecture for claw-free graphs without isolated vertices.
Constructed $K_{1,r}$-free graphs where the conjecture fails for $r \,\geq\, 4$.
Showed $C_5$ as the smallest counterexample to a related problem.
Abstract
For a graph , let denote the maximum order of an induced subgraph of all of whose vertices have odd degree, and let denote the chromatic number of . Scott (CPC, 1992) proved that for every graph without isolated vertices, and conjectured that the factor can be removed. Wang and Wu (JGT, 2024) showed that this conjecture fails for bipartite graphs, but holds for line graphs. In this article, we confirm Scott's conjecture for claw-free graphs without isolated vertices, thereby strengthening the result of Wang and Wu. We also construct -free graphs of arbitrarily large order to show that the conjecture fails for this broader class, for every integer . Wang and Wu also asked whether holds for every connected regular graph of order . We show that is the smallest…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
