Theoretical estimates for the synthesis of $Z=119$ superheavy nuclei with Ca, Ti, V, and Cr projectiles: effects of reaction $Q$ values and mass-model dependence
K. Kawai, Y. Aritomo, K. Nakajima, S. Takagi, and N. Nishimura

TL;DR
This paper provides theoretical estimates for synthesizing superheavy nuclei with Z=119 using various projectiles, highlighting the impact of reaction Q values and nuclear-mass-model uncertainties on evaporation-residue cross sections.
Contribution
It introduces a hybrid theoretical framework to estimate cross sections for superheavy element synthesis, emphasizing the effects of reaction Q values and mass-model dependence.
Findings
Maximum ER cross sections range from 33 to 233 fb for different reactions.
Reaction Q value and Coulomb barrier height significantly influence ER cross sections.
Nuclear-mass-model uncertainties can cause survival probability differences of one to several orders of magnitude.
Abstract
Fusion reactions with 48Ca beams, which have been used for synthesis of nuclei, face practical limitations for the synthesis of nuclei with because of the limited availability of suitable target nuclei. We estimate evaporation-residue (ER) cross sections for the reactions 48Ca + 254Es, 50Ti + 249Bk, 51V + 248Cm, and 54Cr + 243Am and examine the role of nuclear-mass-model uncertainties. We employ a hybrid framework for the three stages of the fusion reaction. The capture stage is described by the coupled-channels method, the formation stage by a Langevin approach, and the de-excitation stage by a statistical model. Using the nuclear properties from the FRDM2012 mass model, the maximum values of ER cross section summed over all xn channels are calculated to be 233, 206, 33, and 38 fb for the 48Ca + 254Es, 50Ti + 249Bk, 51V + 248Cm, and 54Cr + 243Am reactions,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
