Rather than drafting, vortex capture dictates efficiency in three-hydrofoil schools
Pedro C. Ormonde, Yuanhang Zhu, Daniel Quinn, Keith W Moored

TL;DR
This study investigates how vortex interactions in a three-hydrofoil school enhance collective thrust and efficiency, emphasizing the importance of optimal positioning and wake dynamics.
Contribution
It reveals that vortex-body interactions and optimal spatial phase significantly improve performance, challenging traditional drafting concepts in oscillatory swimmer wakes.
Findings
School of three hydrofoils achieves 58% higher thrust and 24% higher efficiency than isolated foils.
Maximum benefits occur when the follower is directly in the vortex wake of the leader.
Wake breakdown is not observed within three chord lengths downstream, supporting sustained performance benefits.
Abstract
Three-dimensional experiments are presented on a school of three pitching hydrofoils. Two side-by-side leader foils maintain the same relative positions while the location of a third follower foil is varied. Force and flow measurements detail the mechanisms that drive the school to achieve collective thrust and efficiency that are 58% and 24% higher than isolated foils, respectively. Traditional drafting involves positioning yourself in the wake of an upstream object. In wakes with a net momentum deficit, drafting reduces drag by lowering oncoming flow speed. By contrast, wakes from oscillatory swimmers feature strong momentum surplus regions, which increases drag by increasing the oncoming flow. Despite that, our results show that the best performance benefits occur for compact schools where the follower is directly in the vortex wake of a leader, whereas regions of reduced mean flow…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
