Analysis of synthetic OVI absorption associated with galaxy groups in SIMBA and TNG50 simulations
Tanmay Singh, Sanchayeeta Borthakur, Dylan Nelson, Romeel Dav\'e, Tyler McCabe

TL;DR
This study compares synthetic OVI absorption from galaxy groups in SIMBA and TNG50 simulations with observations, revealing differences in covering fractions, kinematics, and dependencies on galaxy properties, highlighting the importance of methodology in such comparisons.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed comparison of synthetic and observed OVI absorption in galaxy groups, emphasizing the impact of feedback models and analysis methods.
Findings
TNG50 has higher OVI covering fraction than SIMBA and observations.
Most absorbers in both simulations are gravitationally bound.
Strong absorbers in TNG50 are near star-forming galaxies within 200 kpc.
Abstract
We compare OVI absorption in synthetic spectra from galaxy groups in the SIMBA and TNG50 cosmological hydrodynamic simulations against those observed from the COS-IGrM survey. We select 14 galaxy groups from each simulation with , closely matching COS-IGrM, and create 90,000 synthetic spectra per group. We demonstrate the utility of synthetic absorption spectroscopy when comparing simulations with QSO absorption-based observations. We investigate absorber properties such as radial distributions and kinematics with respect to the group and nearest galaxy. The OVI covering fraction () in TNG50 () and SIMBA () are both systematically lower than COS-IGrM (). Kinematic analysis reveals that vast majority () of absorbers in both the simulations are gravitationally bound. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
