Machine Learning Supports Existence of Previously Unrecognized Transient Astronomical Phenomena in Historical Observatory Images
Stephen Bruehl, Brian Doherty, Alina Streblyanska, and Beatriz Villarroel

TL;DR
This study uses machine learning to validate the existence of a previously unrecognized population of transient astronomical phenomena in historical images, revealing significant correlations with nuclear testing periods.
Contribution
The paper introduces a machine learning approach to improve transient detection accuracy and confirms the existence of unrecognized transient phenomena linked to nuclear testing periods.
Findings
Transient counts are elevated during nuclear testing windows.
ML model accurately discriminates real transients from plate defects.
Significant shadow deficit observed in high-probability transients.
Abstract
Transient, star-like point sources that appear and vanish over short timescales are described in astronomical images prior to launch of Sputnik. We have reported that transient numbers diminish significantly in Earth's shadow (shadow deficit) and are more likely within (plus/minus) one day of nuclear testing (nuclear window). These findings remain debated with some arguing that transients identified via existing automated pipelines are simply plate defects. Therefore, we use machine learning (ML) to enhance transient identification accuracy and validate the phenomenon. The model was trained against 250 transient image pairs taken 30 minutes apart that were classified as real versus plate defect by expert visual review; the model demonstrated good discrimination (out-of-fold AUC0.81; sensitivity0.71, specificity0.71). After deployment in a dataset of 107,875…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
