CAHAL: Clinically Applicable resolution enHAncement for Low-resolution MRI scans
Sergio Morell-Ortega, \'Angela Gonz\'alez-Cebri\'an, Boris Mansencal, Marien Gadea, Roberto Vivo-Hernando, Gregorio Rubio, Fernando Aparici, Maria de la Iglesia-Vaya, Gwenaelle Catheline, Pierrick Coup\'e, Jos\'e V. Manj\'on

TL;DR
CAHAL is a physics-informed, robust super-resolution framework for low-resolution brain MRI scans that enhances resolution while preserving anatomical accuracy for clinical analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a deterministic Mixture of Experts architecture conditioned on resolution and anisotropy, improving super-resolution accuracy and robustness in clinical MRI.
Findings
CAHAL outperforms existing methods in accuracy and efficiency.
It generalizes well across different MRI sequences and acquisition parameters.
The method reduces anatomical distortions common in generative super-resolution.
Abstract
Large-scale automated morphometric analysis of brain MRI is limited by the thick-slice, anisotropic acquisitions prevalent in routine clinical practice. Existing generative super-resolution (SR) methods produce visually compelling isotropic volumes but often introduce anatomical hallucinations, systematic volumetric overestimation, and structural distortions that compromise downstream quantitative analysis and diagnostic safety. To address this, we propose CAHAL (Clinically Applicable resolution enHAncement for Low-resolution MRI scans), a hallucination-robust, physics-informed resolution enhancement framework that operates directly in the patient's native acquisition space. CAHAL employs a deterministic bivariate Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture routing each input through specialised residual 3D U-Net experts conditioned on both volumetric resolution and acquisition anisotropy,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
