Linking System of Jets to the Non-Gravitational Acceleration of 3I/ATLAS
Toni Scarmato, Abraham Loeb

TL;DR
This study links observed jet orientations and non-gravitational accelerations of 3I/ATLAS to understand its dynamics, using jet morphology, precise measurements, and modeling to estimate thrust and acceleration components.
Contribution
It introduces a method to connect jet position angles with non-gravitational accelerations, providing new insights into the comet's physical forces and uncertainties involved.
Findings
Jet2 aligns with the transverse direction within 0.5 degrees on 2025-11-30.
Jet3 is closest to the normal direction with a 25-degree offset.
Jet2 shows a monotonic PA drift over 24 minutes on 2025-12-27.
Abstract
Building on the jet morphology and periodic wobble analysis of 3I/ATLAS in Scarmato & Loeb (2026), we link observed jet position angles (PAs) and the non-gravitational acceleration components (A1,A2,A3) in the 3D RTN (radial, transverse, normal) frame relative to the Sun. We: (i) compute RTN directions from heliocentric state vectors and project them on the sky at the measured astromet ric pointings; (ii) compare projected RTN PAs to three persistent jets (Jet1-Jet2-Jet3) and quantify angular offsets; and (iii) estimate order-of-magnitude thrust and accelerations from HST/WFC3-UVIS F350LP net counts via transformations from photometry to cross-section, dust mass, mass-loss rate, and thrust. We explicitly document the uncertainties through background handling, phase-function systematics, and geometric degeneracies along the line of sight. For U.T. 2025-11-30.80903, Jet2 is aligned with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
