Opinion polarization from compression-based decision making where agents optimize local complexity and global simplicity

TL;DR

This paper presents an agent-based model combining the desire for uniqueness and information simplification, showing how these cognitive mechanisms can lead to social polarization and opinion clustering.

Contribution

It introduces a novel model integrating cognitive drives to explain the emergence of opinion polarization and clusters in social systems.

Findings

Polarization occurs at moderate group sizes, aligning with Dunbar's number.

Higher cognitive compression increases unpredictability in opinion dynamics.

Individuals continue to adjust opinions post-cluster formation, leading to ongoing variation.

Abstract

Understanding social polarization requires integrating insights from psychology, sociology, and complex systems science. Agent-based modeling provides a natural framework to combine perspectives from different fields and explore how individual cognition shapes collective outcomes. This study introduces a novel agent-based model that integrates two cognitive and social mechanisms: the desire to be unique within a group (optimal distinctiveness theory) and the tendency to simplify complex information (cognitive compression). In the model, virtual agents interact in pairs and decide whether to adopt each other's opinions by balancing two opposing drives: maximizing opinion diversity within their local social group while simplifying the overall opinion landscape, with both evaluated using Shannon entropy. We show that the combination of these mechanisms can reproduce real-world patterns, such as the emergence of distinct heterogeneous opinion clusters. Moreover, unlike many existing models where opinions become fixed once opinion groups form, individuals in our model continue to adjust their opinions after clusters emerge, leading to ongoing variation within and between opinion groups. Computational experiments reveal that polarization emerges when local group sizes are moderate (consistent with Dunbar's number), while smaller groups cause fragmentation and larger ones hinder distinct cluster formation. Higher cognitive compression increases unpredictability, while lower compression produces more consistent group structures. These results demonstrate how simple psychological rules can generate complex, realistic social behavior and advance understanding of polarization in human societies.