Beyond Coefficients: Forecast-Necessity Testing for Interpretable Causal Discovery in Nonlinear Time-Series Models
Valentina Kuskova, Dmitry Zaytsev, Michael Coppedge

TL;DR
This paper introduces a forecast-necessity testing framework for causal discovery in nonlinear time-series models, emphasizing predictive importance over coefficient magnitude for interpretability.
Contribution
It proposes a practical evaluation procedure based on edge ablation and forecast comparison, demonstrated through a case study on democracy indicators across countries.
Findings
Forecast necessity differs from causal scores in nonlinear models.
Relationships with similar scores can have different predictive importance.
Forecast-necessity testing enhances reliable causal reasoning in applied AI.
Abstract
Nonlinear machine-learning models are increasingly used to discover causal relationships in time-series data, yet the interpretation of their outputs remains poorly understood. In particular, causal scores produced by regularized neural autoregressive models are often treated as analogues of regression coefficients, leading to misleading claims of statistical significance. In this paper, we argue that causal relevance in nonlinear time-series models should be evaluated through forecast necessity rather than coefficient magnitude, and we present a practical evaluation procedure for doing so. We present an interpretable evaluation framework based on systematic edge ablation and forecast comparison, which tests whether a candidate causal relationship is required for accurate prediction. Using Neural Additive Vector Autoregression as a case study model, we apply this framework to a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
