Global Web, Local Privacy? An International Review of Web Tracking
Harry Yu, Patton Yin, Sebastian Zimmeck

TL;DR
This study evaluates how different countries' privacy laws impact web tracking levels, revealing that stricter regulations like the EU's GDPR reduce tracking, but global practices often undermine these protections.
Contribution
It provides an international comparison of web tracking across countries and assesses the tangible effects of privacy laws like GDPR on tracking behaviors.
Findings
EU countries have 50.5% fewer tracker connections on average.
Not interacting with cookie banners reduces trackers by 48.5%.
EU privacy laws have a measurable impact on reducing web tracking.
Abstract
Web tracking by ad networks, social networks, and other third parties is privacy-invasive. To protect users' privacy an increasing number of countries are adopting new privacy laws. However, a major reason why their application on the web is so challenging is that privacy laws are local while the web is global. To that end, we evaluate websites' tracker connections for ten countries for two sets of sites -- the global Common Top 525 and the Country-specific Top 525 sites. We find that Australia and the US (California) -- two of the three opt-out jurisdictions in our study -- have the highest level of web tracking while opt-in jurisdictions generally have lower levels. We also find that the Common Top 525 sites have 50.5\% fewer average tracker connections when accessed from EU countries compared to non-EU countries. Further, simply not interacting with cookie banners decreases trackers…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
