On the Importance and Evaluation of Narrativity in Natural Language AI Explanations
Mateusz Cedro, David Martens

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of narrativity in natural language explanations for AI, proposing new metrics and rules to generate more human-like, narrative explanations that improve interpretability.
Contribution
It introduces seven automatic metrics to evaluate narrative quality in explanations and proposes rules for generating more effective, narrative-based XAI explanations.
Findings
Standard NLP metrics do not effectively measure narrativity.
Proposed metrics better distinguish narrative explanations from non-narrative.
Benchmarking shows current methods lack strong narrative properties.
Abstract
Explainable AI (XAI) aims to make the behaviour of machine learning models interpretable, yet many explanation methods remain difficult to understand. The integration of Natural Language Generation into XAI aims to deliver explanations in textual form, making them more accessible to practitioners. Current approaches, however, largely yield static lists of feature importances. Although such explanations indicate what influences the prediction, they do not explain why the prediction occurs. In this study, we draw on insights from social sciences and linguistics, and argue that XAI explanations should be presented in the form of narratives. Narrative explanations support human understanding through four defining properties: continuous structure, cause-effect mechanisms, linguistic fluency, and lexical diversity. We show that standard Natural Language Processing (NLP) metrics based solely…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
