
TL;DR
This study analyzes 70 AI agent systems to identify common architectural decisions, patterns, and co-occurrences, providing insights and guidance for designing and selecting agent-system frameworks.
Contribution
It introduces a transparent methodology for analyzing heterogeneous agent systems and uncovers recurring design dimensions, patterns, and co-occurrence structures.
Findings
Five recurring design dimensions identified: subagent architecture, context management, tool systems, safety mechanisms, and orchestration.
Corpus favors file-persistent, hybrid, and hierarchical context strategies; registry-oriented tools dominate.
Deep coordination correlates with explicit context, structured governance, and formalized tool registration.
Abstract
AI agent systems increasingly rely on reusable non-LLM engineering infrastructure that packages tool mediation, context handling, delegation, safety control, and orchestration. Yet the architectural design decisions in this surrounding infrastructure remain understudied. This paper presents a protocol-guided, source-grounded empirical study of 70 publicly available agent-system projects, addressing three questions: which design-decision dimensions recur across projects, which co-occurrences structure those decisions, and which typical architectural patterns emerge. Methodologically, we contribute a transparent investigation procedure for analyzing heterogeneous agent-system corpora through source-code and technical-material reading. Empirically, we identify five recurring design dimensions (subagent architecture, context management, tool systems, safety mechanisms, and orchestration)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
