TL;DR
This paper systematically investigates why multi-agent systems for idea generation often experience diversity collapse, identifying structural coupling as a key factor and providing insights for designing more effective collaborative AI.
Contribution
It reveals how interaction structures and system dynamics lead to diversity collapse in multi-agent LLM systems, emphasizing the importance of independence and disagreement.
Findings
Stronger models yield diminishing diversity despite higher quality.
Authority dynamics suppress semantic diversity.
Dense communication accelerates premature convergence.
Abstract
Multi-agent systems (MAS) are increasingly used for open-ended idea generation, driven by the expectation that collective interaction will broaden the exploration diversity. However, when and why such collaboration truly expands the solution space remains unclear. We present a systematic empirical study of diversity in MAS-based ideation across three bottom-up levels: model intelligence, agent cognition, and system dynamics. At the model level, we identify a compute efficiency paradox, where stronger, highly aligned models yield diminishing marginal diversity despite higher per-sample quality. At the cognition level, authority-driven dynamics suppress semantic diversity compared to junior-dominated groups. At the system level, group-size scaling yields diminishing returns and dense communication topologies accelerate premature convergence. We characterize these outcomes as collective…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
