TL;DR
This paper introduces a label-free governance monitoring extension for risk decision systems, using composite proxy metrics to detect performance degradation without requiring ground truth labels.
Contribution
It presents a novel, integrated framework combining proxy-based drift detection with governance alerts, validated on credit scoring and fraud detection datasets.
Findings
Proxy metrics distinguish covariate degradation from natural drift.
Pure concept drift shows no change in proxy metrics, highlighting a structural verification blind spot.
Composite scores enable graduated governance responses based on severity.
Abstract
Risk decision systems in fraud detection and credit scoring operate under structural label absence: ground truth arrives weeks to months after decisions are made. During this blind period, model performance may degrade silently, eroding the governance evidence that justifies automated decisions. Existing drift detection methods either require labels (supervised detectors) or detect statistical change without distinguishing harmful degradation from benign distributional evolution (unsupervised detectors). No existing framework integrates drift detection with governance evidence assessment and operational response. This paper presents a label-free governance monitoring extension to the Governance Drift Toolkit that produces governance alerts rather than statistical alarms. The monitoring architecture applies composite multi-proxy monitoring across four proxy monitors (score…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
