Trajectory-Based Optimization for Air Traffic Control in the Terminal Maneuvering Area

TL;DR

This paper introduces a trajectory-based optimization framework for arrival sequencing and scheduling in the terminal maneuvering area, improving efficiency and safety through real-time, optimized aircraft trajectories.

Contribution

It develops a novel nonlinear programming approach that jointly optimizes path and speed profiles, incorporating advanced landing order policies and real-time decision-making capabilities.

Findings

FOFFS outperforms FEFS in delay and fuel burn.

CPS reduces separation violations but increases solver cost.

Per-entry optimization completes in near real-time.

Abstract

We present a trajectory-based optimization framework for arrival sequencing and scheduling in the terminal maneuvering area (TMA). Unlike node-link scheduling models that reduce trajectories to time-delay variables, the proposed method computes implementable per-aircraft speed profiles and path extensions that achieve required landing separation through terminal air traffic control actions. The framework combines an analytic TMA path model, consisting of a tangent leg, a radius-to-fix turn, and a final-approach segment, with a nonlinear program (NLP) that jointly optimizes path stretch and segment speeds under a weighted objective. Three landing-order policies are examined: First-Entry-First-Serve (FEFS), First-on-Final-First-Serve (FOFFS), and FOFFS with Constrained Position Shifting (CPS) up to $k$ positions. CPS is implemented through a two-phase approach coupling mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) with NLP to select an optimized landing order before trajectory optimization. The aircraft population follows a realistic weight-class fleet mix with pair-specific wake-turbulence separation, and each scenario is perturbed by a Gaussian wind sample projected onto each segment to convert commanded airspeeds into ground speeds. An online rolling-horizon formulation commits each aircraft trajectory irrevocably upon entry, enabling real-time decision-making. Monte Carlo experiments on the simplified A80 TMA show that: (i) FOFFS consistently outperforms FEFS in delay, path stretch, and fuel burn by exploiting geometric asymmetries among arrival streams; (ii) CPS further reduces separation violations and path stretch, though with diminishing returns and rapidly increasing solver cost; (iii) fuel estimates from BADA 3 and OpenAP show consistent qualitative trends; and (iv) per-entry optimization completes in near real-time, supporting practical deployment.