Classification and deontic explosion for contrary-to-duty obligations
Bj{\o}rn Kjos-Hanssen

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a recent deontic logic system, demonstrating a limited deontic explosion phenomenon and providing a novel classification of models based on a single forbidden world.
Contribution
It reveals a limited deontic explosion in Carmo and Jones' latest system and offers a surprising model classification approach.
Findings
Limited deontic explosion: any non-highest grade is acceptable if the highest is not achieved.
All models satisfying the strongest 1997 system can be characterized by one forbidden world.
Abstract
Carmo and Jones have presented a sequence of candidate axiom systems for conditional obligation between 1997 and 2022. For their most recent system we demonstrate a limited form of deontic explosion: given that a student does not get the highest possible grade on a test, any other passing grade is acceptable. In addition to that negative result, we give a positive one: revisiting the strongest version of Carmo and Jones' 1997 system, we provide a surprising classification of all satisfying models in terms of a single forbidden possible world.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
