TL;DR
This paper presents a neuro-symbolic framework that detects and verifies recommendation conflicts in multimorbidity clinical guidelines, improving AI reliability and addressing guideline fragmentation.
Contribution
The authors introduce a multi-agent neuro-symbolic system that translates clinical language into logical form and verifies conflicts using a SAT solver, a novel approach in medical AI.
Findings
90.6% of conflicts are local and arise from comorbidities
State-of-the-art LLMs fail to detect these conflicts
Our approach achieves an F1 score of 0.861 in conflict detection
Abstract
Clinical guidelines, typically developed by independent specialty societies, inherently exhibit substantial fragmentation, redundancy, and logical contradiction. These inconsistencies, particularly when applied to patients with multimorbidity, not only cause cognitive dissonance for clinicians but also introduce catastrophic noise into AI systems, rendering the standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system fragile and prone to hallucination. To address this fundamental reliability crisis, we introduce a Neuro-Symbolic framework that automates the detection of recommendation redundancies and conflicts. Our pipeline employs a multi-agent system to translate unstructured clinical natural language into rigorous symbolic logic language, which is then verified by a Satisfiability (SAT) solver. By formulating a hierarchical taxonomy of logical rule interactions, we identify a critical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
