Yanasse: Finding New Proofs from Deep Vision's Analogies, Part 1
Alexandre Linhares

TL;DR
Yanasse introduces a domain-independent method leveraging deep vision and analogy to transfer proof strategies across mathematical areas, successfully generating new proofs in Lean with high accuracy.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel, domain-agnostic approach combining deep vision, analogy, and AI reasoning to discover new mathematical proofs by transferring tactic patterns.
Findings
Produced 4 verified proofs out of 10 attempts (40%) in probability to representation theory transfer.
Tactic schemas decompose into a head and a modifier, with the modifier often transferring across domains.
The matching engine is domain-independent, relying only on a relation extractor.
Abstract
Project Yanasse presents a method for discovering new proofs of theorems in one area of mathematics by transferring proof strategy patterns (e.g., Lean 4 tactic invocation patterns) from a structurally distant area. The system extracts tactic usage distributions across 27 top-level areas of Mathlib (217,133 proof states), computes z-scores to identify tactics that are heavily used in a source area but rare or absent in a target area, matches source and target proof states via GPU-accelerated NP-hard analogy (running on a MacBook Air via Apple's MPS backend), and then asks an AI reasoning agent to semantically adapt--not symbol-substitute--the source tactics invocation pattern to the target theorem. In this first part of the study, the method is applied to the pair Probability -> Representation Theory, producing 4 Lean-verified new proofs out of 10 attempts (40%). The proofs compile with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
