TL;DR
This paper introduces a reasoning and reward-based framework for multi-role dialogue summarization that improves factual faithfulness and human preference alignment beyond traditional metric optimization.
Contribution
It couples explicit reasoning traces with reward optimization to enhance faithfulness and preference alignment in multi-role dialogue summarization.
Findings
Matches strong baselines on ROUGE and BERTScore
Improves factual faithfulness on SAMSum dataset
Demonstrates stable semantic consistency on CSDS
Abstract
Multi-role dialogue summarization requires modeling complex interactions among multiple speakers while preserving role-specific information and factual consistency. However, most existing methods optimize for automatic metrics such as ROUGE and BERTScore, which favor surface-level imitation of references rather than genuine gains in faithfulness or alignment with human preferences. We propose a novel framework that couples explicit cognitive-style reasoning with reward-based optimization for multi-role dialogue summarization. Our method first distills structured reasoning traces (e.g., step-by-step inferences and intermediate reflections) from a large teacher model and uses them as auxiliary supervision to initialize a reasoning-aware summarizer via staged supervised fine-tuning. It then applies GRPO with a dual-principle reward that blends metric-based signals with human-aligned…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
