Sloan's Analytical G\"omb\"oc Does Not Produce Mono-Monostatic Bodies: Computational Verification, Extended Construction, and a Thirteen-Member Verified Catalog
Vincent Wesley Couey

TL;DR
This paper computationally verifies Sloan's analytical bodies, extends the construction method, and publishes the first verified catalog of thirteen mono-monostatic geometries with detailed robustness and gentleness trade-offs.
Contribution
It introduces a new ECS oracle for stability measurement, extends Sloan's phase function with Fourier terms, and provides the first open catalog of verified mono-monostatic bodies.
Findings
No tested Sloan parameter produces a mono-monostatic body.
Thirteen verified mono-monostatic bodies are constructed and published.
A near-perfect trade-off between robustness and gentleness is observed.
Abstract
Varkonyi and Domokos (2006) proved mono-monostatic convex homogeneous bodies exist, and Sloan (2023) provided analytical equations. However, no verified open geometry exists and the relationship between Sloan's parameterization and actual mono-monostatic behavior has never been computationally tested. We introduce an ECS oracle measuring stable equilibria via drainage basin analysis on the COM height landscape. Applying it to Sloan's parameterization, we find no tested parameter value produces a mono-monostatic body. The surface function has two critical points as proven, but the COM height landscape exhibits 4-11 local minima. Surface critical points are necessary but not sufficient. We resolve this by extending Sloan's phase function with Fourier terms and adding radial perturbations, optimizing via differential evolution. Using both approaches, we construct thirteen verified…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
