Krylov complexity for Lin-Maldacena geometries and their holographic duals
Dibakar Roychowdhury

TL;DR
This paper investigates the growth of operator size in matrix models related to Lin-Maldacena geometries using classical probes, and explores Krylov complexity in various brane limits and a matrix model reduction.
Contribution
It introduces a method to compute Krylov complexity in matrix models with holographic duals, including new examples and an algorithm for basis construction.
Findings
Krylov basis states are uniquely determined by the matrix model's mass parameter.
Lanczos coefficients can be computed and are fixed by the mass parameter.
The approach applies to BMN, D2, NS5 brane limits, and non-Abelian T-dual geometries.
Abstract
We compute the rate of growth of operator size in matrix models by probing the Lin-Maldacena class of geometries with classical probes. We consider massive point particle probes whose proper momentum equals the size of the gauge invariant operator in the matrix model. We work out the example of the BMN Plane Wave Matrix Model using the electrostatic approach and the method of background fluxes. We also work out complexities in the D2 brane as well as NS5 brane limits of the BMN matrix model along with an example of the irrelevant deformation namely the non-Abelian T-dual of . Finally, we carry out a possible calculation of the Krylov complexity on the matrix model counterpart by using a simple reduction ansatz known as the pulsating fuzzy sphere model. We outline an algorithm to define Krylov basis elements for the matrix model and compute a few Lanczos coefficients.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
