Continuous transformations of probability measures and their transport representations
Hugo Lavenant, Giuseppe Savar\'e

TL;DR
This paper investigates when and how a transformation of probability measures can be represented as a push-forward via a map, focusing on regularity conditions and the impact of Lipschitz continuity in Wasserstein space.
Contribution
It characterizes the existence and regularity of transport representations of measure transformations, especially under Lipschitz conditions, with illustrative examples.
Findings
Transport representations exist under certain conditions.
Lipschitz continuity ensures continuous transport maps.
Examples demonstrate the sharpness of assumptions.
Abstract
Given a function transforming a probability measure into another one , we study the existence and regularity of a transport representation of it. That is, we ask whether we can represent the image of the input probability measure as the push-forward of by a map which may depend on ; and furthermore, how regular can be chosen depending on . Even if is continuous and a transport representative exists, it cannot necessarily be chosen in a continuous way; however, if is Lipschitz continuous with respect to the Wasserstein distance, then can be chosen continuous. We provide several examples to illustrate the sharpness of our assumptions. This question is motivated by approximation results for transformations of probability distributions with transformers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
