Can a CNOT Gate Affect the Control Qubit? Student Resources for Understanding CNOT and Entanglement
Jonan-Rohi S. Plueger, Bethany R. Wilcox, Steven J. Pollock, and Gina Passante

TL;DR
This study investigates how students understand the CNOT gate in quantum computing, identifying key reasoning resources and common misconceptions through think-aloud interviews.
Contribution
It reveals the cognitive resources students use to reason about CNOT and how these can lead to correct or incorrect conclusions, informing teaching strategies.
Findings
Students rely on procedural, qualitative, and control qubit invariance resources.
Use of these resources can lead to correct or incorrect reasoning about CNOT.
Students' reasoning varies when using Dirac notation, superpositions, and entanglement.
Abstract
The Controlled-Not (CNOT) gate is essential to algorithms in quantum computing for its ability to entangle qubits. As such, it is important to understand how students learning quantum computing reason around the function and use of this critical quantum gate. To investigate this, we conducted think-aloud interviews in which students solved problems involving the CNOT gate to understand students' `CNOT toolbox' -- the strategies and cognitive resources students use when reasoning about the effect of the CNOT gate. We identify three cognitive resources related to the CNOT gate: (1) the procedural resource of applying CNOT to specific states, (2) a qualitative description of CNOT's effect on the target qubit given the control qubit, and (3) the idea that the control qubit is not changed when CNOT is applied to computational basis states. We find that students' use of the first resource is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
