A High-Accuracy Optical Music Recognition Method Based on Bottleneck Residual Convolutions

TL;DR

This paper introduces an end-to-end optical music recognition framework combining residual bottleneck convolutions with BiGRU sequence modeling, achieving high accuracy and efficiency on standard datasets.

Contribution

The novel integration of residual bottleneck CNNs with BiGRU for OMR improves accuracy and computational efficiency over existing methods.

Findings

Achieves SeER of 7.52% on Camera-PrIMuS dataset.

Attains symbol error rate of 0.45% with high pitch and note accuracy.

Demonstrates fast training time of 1.74 seconds per epoch.

Abstract

Optical Music Recognition (OMR) aims to convert printed or handwritten music score images into editable symbolic representations. This paper presents an end-to-end OMR framework that combines residual bottleneck convolutions with bidirectional gated recurrent unit (BiGRU)-based sequence modeling. A convolutional neural network with ResNet-v2-style residual bottleneck blocks and multi-scale dilated convolutions is used to extract features that encode both fine-grained symbol details and global staff-line structures. The extracted feature sequences are then fed into a BiGRU network to model temporal dependencies among musical symbols. The model is trained using the Connectionist Temporal Classification loss, enabling end-to-end prediction without explicit alignment annotations. Experimental results on the Camera-PrIMuS and PrIMuS datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. On Camera-PrIMuS, the proposed method achieves a sequence error rate (SeER) of $7.52\%$ and a symbol error rate (SyER) of $0.45\%$, with pitch, type, and note accuracies of $99.33\%$, $99.60\%$, and $99.28\%$, respectively. The average training time is 1.74~s per epoch, demonstrating high computational efficiency while maintaining strong recognition performance. On PrIMuS, the method achieves a SeER of $8.11\%$ and a SyER of $0.49\%$, with pitch, type, and note accuracies of $99.27\%$, $99.58\%$, and $99.21\%$, respectively. A fine-grained error analysis further confirms the effectiveness of the proposed model.