A Discordance-Aware Multimodal Framework with Multi-Agent Clinical Reasoning
Pegah Ahadian, Mingrui Yang, Sixu Chen, Xiaojuan Li, Qiang Guan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a multimodal framework that models discordance between imaging and symptoms in knee osteoarthritis, enhancing clinical decision support with multi-agent reasoning and interpretable phenotypes.
Contribution
It presents a novel multi-agent system combining machine learning models and interpretability techniques to better understand and manage osteoarthritis discordance.
Findings
Models accurately predict joint space loss and pain progression.
The system computes a discordance score indicating symptom-structure mismatch.
Multi-agent reasoning provides clinically interpretable phenotypes and recommendations.
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis frequently exhibits discordance between structural damage observed in imaging and patient-reported symptoms such as pain. This mismatch complicates clinical interpretation and patient stratification and remains insufficiently modeled in existing decision support systems. We propose a discordance aware multimodal framework that combines machine learning prediction models with a tool grounded multi agent reasoning system. Using baseline data from the FNIH Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium, we trained multimodal models to predict two progression tasks, joint space loss only progression versus non progression, and pain only progression versus non progression. The predictive system integrates three modality specific experts: a CatBoost tabular model using demographic, radiographic, MRI-derived scalar, and biomarker features; MRI image embeddings extracted using a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
