Large-eddy simulation of the FDA benchmark blood pump: validation against experiments and implications for turbulent flow mechanisms
Xuanming Huang, Chi Ding, Yujie Sun, Shidi Huang, Andrea Cioncolini, Damiano Padovani, Ju Liu

TL;DR
This paper validates large-eddy simulation (LES) for blood pump flow against experiments, showing LES's superior accuracy over RANS methods in turbulence-rich regions, and offers guidance for future high-fidelity studies.
Contribution
It demonstrates the effectiveness of LES with transient rotor-stator coupling in accurately capturing turbulent blood pump flows, outperforming traditional RANS approaches.
Findings
LES with transient coupling matches experimental data better than RANS.
Mesh resolution of ~80 million cells is needed for well-resolved LES.
LES reveals detailed vortex structures and turbulence characteristics.
Abstract
This study presents a systematic validation and comparative assessment of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) strategies for centrifugal blood pump simulations using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration benchmark model. A scale-resolving large eddy simulation (LES) with transient sliding-interface (SI) coupling is evaluated and compared against Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approaches employing both multiple reference frame and SI formulations. Numerical predictions are validated through direct comparison with particle image velocimetry measurements under two representative operating conditions. The results indicate that LES with transient rotor-stator coupling achieves consistently improved agreement with experimental velocity fields compared with RANS-based methods, particularly in the diffuser region where strong intermittency and wall-bounded turbulence are present. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
