Limits of Lamarckian Evolution Under Pressure of Morphological Novelty
Jed R Muff, Karine Miras, A.E. Eiben

TL;DR
This paper investigates how Lamarckian inheritance in evolving modular robots performs under high morphological diversity, revealing a trade-off between inheritance benefits and diversity-driven exploration.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Lamarckian evolution's advantage diminishes with increased morphological novelty, highlighting fundamental limits in such systems.
Findings
Lamarckian evolution outperforms Darwinian when optimizing for task performance.
Introducing morphological diversity reduces Lamarckian system performance.
Diversity promotion decreases parent-offspring similarity, limiting inheritance benefits.
Abstract
Lamarckian inheritance has been shown to be a powerful accelerator in systems where the joint evolution of robot morphologies and controllers is enhanced with individual learning. Its defining advantage lies in the offspring inheriting controllers learned by their parents. The efficacy of this option, however, relies on morphological similarity between parent and offspring. In this study, we examine how Lamarckian inheritance performs when the search process is driven toward high morphological variance, potentially straining the requirement for parent-offspring similarity. Using a system of modular robots that can evolve and learn to solve a locomotion task, we compare Darwinian and Lamarckian evolution to determine how they respond to shifting from pure task-based selection to a multi-objective pressure that also rewards morphological novelty. Our results confirm that Lamarckian…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
